A Need to be Needed

DSC_3270

 

 

When I retired from the classroom, my heart felt as if had been tossed on the beach at low tide for the seagulls to pick at what remained of me.  Although I knew better, I wondered how next year’s class of Senior English students could be adequately prepared for college by another teacher.  These feelings demonstrate either humungous hubris or festering fear.  What I have since acknowledged is that I need to be needed.  Being needed justifies taking up air and soil from a planet with a paucity of resources.

Only recently have I explored how and by whom these needs are defined.  I suspect that many are defined by a patriarchal tradition:  making dinner for my husband, doing laundry etc. – all necessities for myself as well. IMG_4105 When I look outside of my own experience to other women’s lives, I see similar patterns of fulfilling needs for others, mostly domestic needs, that make others’ lives comfortable.  Does the fulfilling of those needs enrich the “needed” woman?  Would she have chosen the tasks without societal expectation?

I reflect on my mother’s life in trying to understand my own.  My mother began her typical day setting out sack lunches for her children (if we were still in school), and then making breakfast for all. Soon after, she set off to work as a bank secretary, eventually an “executive secretary” to the manager.  Not only did she type his correspondence, she approved loans and managed certain business accounts, jobs that would today earn a title of loan officer, or even vice president, but executive secretary sealed her salary and her prestige.  During her lunch hour, she walked across the street to the supermarket to buy groceries for preparing dinner when she got home.  After dinner and with dishes put away, she made her “creative time,” either haltingly playing the piano, a treat she afforded herself with biweekly lessons, MV5BMTQ1MTIzOTYwMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTM3MzYwMg@@._V1_UX100_CR0,0,100,100_AL_or she sat before the television watching Murder She Wrote with Angela Lansberry, who had a startling resemblance to Mother.  As my mother did her vicarious sleuthing, she did needlework, usually a square of a quilt painstakingly appliqued or cross stitched.  She played piano for no one’s pleasure but her own.  Her needlework may have ended in a gift or a practical blanket for a bed, but ultimately, she stitched for the beauty of the thing. At the end of her workday, she fulfilled a call to be needed by herself. Did it also fulfill her to know that her family needed her food, her cleanliness, her salary?IMG_8218

Our family chuckled at my mother’s devotion to Murder She Wrote. Having recently read Deborah Levy’s The Cost of Living, I can revisit my mother through Levy’s words: “Did I mock the dreamer in my mother and then insult her for having no dreams?”

I considered calling this piece, After the Chores are Done, for that is when Mother’s needs were addressed.  That is also when my needs are addressed.  If there are domestic duties ahead of me, no writing happens.  My piano stands silently accusing me of skipping another day to practice Chopin, although a lesson looms the next day.  I ignore creative pleasures I hesitate to elevate to “need” status, because there are tasks ahead that improve the lives of others.  CIMG2757.JPGTop on the siren call would be perceived needs from my grandchildren and daughter.  My granddaughter, a college senior, emails me a draft of her senior English thesis for editing.  Her request leapfrogs to the top of my to-do list, real or imagined.  I am flattered to be needed, especially to be needed for something that acknowledges I have a brain, not only a scrub brush.

Her thesis has a reference to Mrs. Ramsey in Virginia Woolf’s To a Lighthouse.  Married, and shrouded with the needs of her family, any creative vision Mrs. Ramsey might have is detoured through fulfilling family concerns.  She knits socks, never quite finishing them.  Juxtaposing Mrs. Ramsey is the unmarried Lily Briscoe who paints and completes a painting, Mrs. Ramsey’s domestic subservience to the needs of others shows a creative vision is impossible.  Darning socks short circuits her visionary potential.   I am considering that perhaps to be freely creative, a woman must be unshackled from family. On the other hand, an unmarried woman can be satisfied with fulfilling her own needs.

Would my mother’s life have been more creative had she not committed to a family? There is no way to know, but I am hoping she, like me, found enrichment in the creative imagination of thought, even in the sewing of quilts.  For me, it would be ironing or kneading bread.  For Mrs. Ramsey, as she knit, the narrative voice suggests a certain intelligence, a vision, so to speak.  The reader has a sense of her visionary voice, however unfilled it might have been were she to complete a painting or write a novel.

The need to be needed may have hindered my creative life, or motivated it in inspiring me to be the most imaginative teacher I could be.  Teaching itself is a creative act. With a filing cabinet stuffed with last year’s lesson plans, I recreated them each year. Although I may have been doing so to fulfill my students’ needs, I equally fulfilled my desire for change — delight in doing something different with certain literature I had taught several times.

For many women, the struggle continues in deciding whether we can live freely within a family structure.  Perhaps the face-off of domestic duties and the poet within us creates an energized art that would not exist without the struggle. Deborah Levy quotes Audre Lorde in feeling that tension: “I am a reflection of my mother’s secret poetry as well as of her hidden angers”. (Audre Lorde)

CIMG3836.JPG

 

 

 

My Feminist Garden

  DSC_1074.JPG

I am a seventy-five-year-old poet

                  who writes lyrical poems

                  tuned to iambic pentameter.

Today, I want to write a modern poem

                  about daffodils I planted in October.

Some line up in a row by the split rail fence,

                  but more often now I plant them in clusters.

I’ve learned over the years that one flower

                  isn’t beautiful because she stands

                  next to one that is plain.

In clusters, or circles, the yellow bells

                  sing like a choir of sopranos.

That simile slips out from the lyrical

                  voice I am trying to suppress,

                  in order to present as post-modern.

Yet, over seven decades, I’ve learned to be heard

                  by suggestion, not assertion,

                  a voice others call strident in women.

I have endured cruel winters

                  like my green daffodils

                  standing unblossomed in March.

January tricked them with moderate rain,

                  so they pushed through soil

                  before February snow muffled their mouths.

The package of bulbs boasted

                  they would regenerate each spring

                  without my having to do a thing.

It is like a law, once passed —

                  say a woman has a right

                  to choose motherhood or not —

                  forever she might decide.

Yet, I return to our nation’s capital to march.

                  holding high a drawing my granddaughter made–

                  a uterus with flowers growing from within

                  reading Not a Political Object.

Two generations from my granddaughter,

                 my seed within her germinates

                  in colors I will not live to see.

She speaks in phrases I did not have:

                  sexual harassment, right-to-choose

                  equal pay for equal work.

She didn’t have to work at the corner drug,

                  where the pharmacist draped mistletoe

                  above the counter where I reached

                  for packages to deliver to nursing homes.

I am straying from my struggling daffodils,

                  something I do often these days,

                  meandering like Wordsworth in my garden.

I text my granddaughter to tell her

                  I enrolled in a University class:

                  The Philosophy of Feminism.

She texts back: Woohoo!

Spring arrives in twenty days,

                  but I have history on my side —

                  the bulbs I planted will bloom.

I will still need to pull weeds.

DSC_1078.JPG

.

                 

                 

                 

                 

GIRL TALK

 

IMG_7400

Having paid for my coffee and scone, I seek a favorite corner table at the Volunteer Park Café.  It is one of two tables by a front window with a view to the orange leaves of a sweet gum tree and a sidewalk café table under its autumnal branches.  It is 7:00 AM on an October morning, the first rainy day of many to follow, so the café lights hold us warmly inside, and with the darkness outside, I cannot see the tree I usually enjoy.  At the table beside me, sits a woman in her 30’s, checking her I-Phone until she looks up to welcome another woman, perhaps a decade older, her hair graying in a stylish bob. The newcomer hangs her rain jacket on the chair, slips her umbrella under the table, and the two of them begin talking before she sits down. Although I am close enough to eavesdrop, I don’t intrude, and besides, I can infer by their exchange, the way they lean in to their shared space — gesturing and taking turns as they speak –that they are helping each other through some little thing.

“That is what friends do,” I think, “especially women friends.”  They tell stories about what happened, and to confirm the friend has listened sympathetically, the other tells a similar story.  Two stories are better than one.  One of the stories echoes the veracity of the other. Are women naturally narrators, or do we tell stories on ourselves to confirm those told by our friends?  Is it a kind of “group think?”

IMG_7403Later in the morning I meet with a woman I have known for twenty-five years. She asks to meet with me to discuss a sadness in her life for which she believes I might have a shared experience.  We have family and friends in common, and they are the subject of her grief.  First, we catch up on little things we do to fill our days.  Then, testing a shared comfort, she begins to tell her personal story of a loss she experienced years before we met.  She pauses.  Because I know the Girl Talk script, I sense she is waiting for me to tell of my own loss years before we met.  From our stories, there might not arise exact similarities,  but there will be a kind of universality of experience that brings understanding to a sad occurrence.  People seek reasons for their pain, but will settle for parallels, if reasons can’t be found.

Perhaps others around us might think we are gossiping.  It is sad that even in Shakespeare’s plays, women are portrayed as Gossips.  The word Gossip itself, when used as a noun instead of a verb, implies a woman, usually an old woman. So much literature and art tells or shows women in confidences sharing those stories, usually about others in the community. Gossiping suggests the stories are negative. Rather than telling a story to arrive at some truth, the Gossip tells stories to denigrate another or elevate herself by juxtaposition. “Did you hear that Maggie Jones spent $500 dollars of her husband’s social security check on new shoes?” 62f4f28099400943d273b309608c5eb5Gossiping is inherently judgmental, and I regret that it is more often associated with women.  But men gossip too. They tell about a business rival who cheats on his income tax.  Men’s Sports Gossip (sometimes referred to as “Locker Room Talk”)  can be as rough as the sports they discuss.

Another common perception of Girl Talk, is that women talk more than men.  That seems situational. When with their own gender, women may speak rapidly.   There is a delight, like a bubbling fountain, when two female friends discuss the best way to do something they both love, such as reading fiction, or when they are sharing complaints from work or home.  When in mixed company, I find women speak less frequently, or turn away from men, to carry on a separate conversation with other women present.  It wasn’t that long ago when after formal dinners, women were escorted to the parlor for music or knitting so that men could converse civilly in their absence. The male talk was to be more serious and consequential than what concerned the women in the parlor. Certainly, the masculine talk was more consequential, because white men held all the power.  Why share it with the powerless?

When women talk, they are expected to keep their voices soft, at least softer than men are permitted to speak.  If women speak loudly or aggressively, they are called “shrill.”  I have never heard a man’s talk referred to as shrill.  At best, angry.  Women are not expected to express anger.  It somehow lessens the power of their message.  Recently our daughter suggested we watch Nanette: Comedy Hour on Netflix.  MV5BY2I3MThmYTctZTU4YS00YWNmLTg4YzktNDY0ZGE5MmQ3Y2Q3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTMxODk2OTU@._V1_UY268_CR4,0,182,268_AL_The stand-up comedian, Hannah Gadsby from Tasmania, based her humor on the awkward lives of lesbian women.  A lesbian herself, she told about her own experiences suffering criticism and misunderstanding.  As the show continued, what was at first humorous, became tragic.  Annoyance grew to righteous indignation.  What she said was no longer funny.  The show was, however, profound.  My husband didn’t enjoy the show, because of Hannah’s expressed anger, even though he sympathized with her many grievances.  If she had spoken softly and slowly, her voice not pitched in indignation, I wonder if he would have more readily accepted the truths she offered.

Women and narrative are one.  The process is not quantitative.  Years ago, when the UW physics department bemoaned the lack of women enrolled in their classes, they researched the differing ways men and women learn, hoping to find an answer there.  They did.  Women are more than twice likely to learn something through a story than are men.  Facts alone won’t stick.  Women are more attracted to a subject embedded in narrative.

There is no more dramatic illustration of the power of Girl Talk than the #MeToo Movement.  The conversations do not stop with “Me Too, I too was harassed or raped.”  The talk continues, “And this is what happened, and this is who did it, and this is what I want now.”  The stories pour out from abused women, not merely for retribution or even for justice, though both are needed.  The stories are also for healing. Carrying unspoken stories is like dragging around a stuffed suitcase of clothes so old and worn you wouldn’t be seen in them in public.  Telling the stories, one old coat after another is cast away, leaving the abused woman weightless, ready to wear a new story that fits comfortably, perhaps helping her feel attractive for the first time.images

“So get to the point,” my husband said yesterday while I was telling him a story about my day.  We were driving in heavy traffic, late to meet friends for dinner.  He was trying to concentrate, while I was talking in my circular way about my day.  But when he said, “So get to the point,” I wanted to protest.   For me, it wasn’t the point that mattered, but the process of telling the story.  Some of my stories intertwine with others, so I cannot just slide down them like a rope that ends in a coil of understanding.  The unfolding of the story is as important as the point, if there is a point at all.  There need not be one, or there may be many.  In the process of telling, I may find a point I didn’t know the story possessed.  Meanwhile, let me tell it.  Let me tell it my way.

Don’t cut me out of the story.  In my parents’ life, there had been a series of infidelities by my father when he was in India in WW II.   All my life, I intuited my mother’s distance and lack of intimacy with him when he returned to the States.  I stumbled across photos of unfamiliar women in a jeep in Delhi, another, a woman sitting on an army truck, her legs crossed so her skirt rode high on her thighs.  My mother did not remove those photos from the album.  Only in the year before she died, when I took my now-widowed mother for a weekend on the Oregon coast, did she tell me some of the story, of her loneliness back in Iowa with three children, of letters my father sent suggesting their marriage might end when he returned.  They did not divorce, by the way, although I think my mother’s life may have been better had they separated.  Because she finally told me the story behind those photos, my heart was less heavy than it had been throughout my childhood.  I was in no better place to repair her life, but her story with that history, helped me experience our mutual love.  grandmahainerbirds 2 .           And there you are — all stories are love stories, because through them we bond as we walk along the tangled paths of our human condition.